3.4: 'Deposits'


The Havering hoard, a deposit
of Late Bronze Age metalwork
The term 'deposit' in archaeology can have two meanings, first as a general term synonymous with 'layer' and referring to something that has been physically deposited either by human or natural activity.

In the narrower sense it can be used to refer to certain groups of artefacts or layers that have been 'deposited' (usually by human activity) within the archaeological record. Examples of these may include graves or hoards where something was put on or in the ground as the result of a single (and often intentional) act.

Obviously, archaeological study of such deposits consists of more than just getting all the objects out of the ground as a group.

Hoards

The site under excavation, before the coins were found
The Beau Street Hoard was a block of silver coins fused together while digging a site on Beau Street in Bath discovered in a small pit under what was once the floor of a Roman building about 450 feet from the famous Roman Bath after which the town was named. Archaeologists think the coins were kept in a wooden box or cloth bag which has now rotted away leaving only the stuck together coins behind.
The hoard was carefully lifted as a single block that was taken to the laboratory for dissection. X-ray analysis of the block found that the coins had been stored in a number of leather bags. As they were removed from the individual bags, each of the coins was then cleaned by manual and chemical processes to enable identification. It was discovered that there were:
- One bag of denarii dating from 32 BC to the 240s AD, plus a handful of radiates from the 250s.
- Four bags of high-silver radiates from the 3rd century, dating up to the 260s.
- Three bags of debased (low-silver) radiates from the 3rd century, dating up to the 270s.

Obviously, if the hoard had been removed in any other way, the information about the different coin batches would have been lost.

The coins under excavation

The coins under excavation, the shape of the wooden box can be seen here. 

The coins under excavation, showing the shape of the vanished leather bags. 


The Seaton Down Hoard was reported by its metal detectorist finder (following the Treasure Act Code of Practice) and therefore properly excavated by a professional team, properly equipped, by a recognised methodology allowing proper observation and documentation and at a proper pace. This was facilitated by arrangements made by the finder to secure the site and guard it over three nights. It consists of 22,000 coins, dating from the A.D. 260s through the 340s.

The original hoik hole (from the finder's video):
The finder's hole

The hoard was reported, and left until it could be properly examined, here it is under methodical excavation:

excavation in progress, finder's photo

excavation in progress, planning grid

The hoard was properly exposed and recorded by drawing and photography. Here we see a close-up of the hoard showing its structure in situ, there seem to be two discrete groups of coins here, it is not one tangled mass of coins


The hoard


Graves
These too are a specific type of deposit that have to be excavated systematically and carefully in order to document the layout of the objects and human remains. The example here is a prehistoric cremation grave from Baley in Bulgaria:


Baley, Bulgaria (Archaeology in Bulgaria)
The relationship between the various forms of vessels is carefully revealed and recorded and compared with other graves of the period to analyse the patterns of deposition, which in turn may reveal information about the function of the vessels and the beliefs behind their deposition.


Livius, 'Roman coin hoard found in Bath by archaeologist' The History Blog  March 25th, 2012




Tamara Kroftova comments:
"The terminology used by British archaeologists is little help in explaining basic concepts to outsiders. The word 'deposits' is a case in point. Perhaps part of the reason why insular archaeologists seem so unwilling to even try to educate artefact hunters is due to the terminological muddle they have created in their own discipline. Not all archaeologies in Europe share these problems, central European archaeology has a much more developed literature on the nature of the archaeological sources than the current situation in Britain". 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.1: What is archaeology?

Image
Archaeological research   as a process There are many possible ways to define the subject and object of study. This is the definition of archaeology used here: Archaeology is the study of aspects the human past through the documentation and analysis of physical remains and traces, their associations and contexts, by the methodology of archaeology and dissemination of the results and conclusions. 1) " The study of aspects of the human past ", The past might be very remote, from the Lower Palaeolithic, where it may intercalate with palaeontology (but archaeologists don't do dinosaurs), to almost the present day (periods when other but not all aspects of the past are amply documented by other sources), 2)  " aspects of the human past ", many areas of the human past are arguably beyond the reach of even the most creative of archaeological thought, 3) " through the documentation ", the archaeological evidence does not exist in a vacuum, curran...
Read more

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati...
Read more

4.1 What the archaeological record looks like in the Ground

Image
If the responsible artefact hunter is to  record the bits of the archaeological record destroyed in removing artefacts in collection-driven exploitation of a site, obviously they need to know what it is they are looking for, in other words, what the archaeological record looks like. At this point, many textbooks would show the reader a section or two showing the superimposed layers ("like a cake"). But that actually is not the way the stratification of a feature are actually encountered in the field. The suggestion that it is the section that is always paramount in the recording and interpretation of a site is a very damaging one. This is despite the prevalence of s ingle-context recording in the standard excavation methodical toolkit for over half a century. The main manner in which the stratigraphical units of a site are met is from above, from the working surface. The first point that this raises is that this should at all times be kept clean of loose soil, trample ...
Read more