8.5: Selling 'Scrap Metal'


A typical scrap bucket, what unrecognised
archaeological evidence is lost here? 
Artefact hunting with a metal detector will in many regions find a large amount of modern (post 1950s) material in the ploughsoil. Artefact hunters regard it as responsible behaviour, having found it, not to return it to the arable land. Some throw it in the hedge ("hedge fodder") or leave it by the gate, both of which is just littering. Others remove it from the site totally and dispose of it safely elsewhere. When this concerns cow udder tubes, shotgun cartridges, ringpulls and aluminium drink cans etc., this is uncontroversial.

Other artefact hunters place in the 'scrap bucket' all items not wanted for their collection, regardless of age or nature, and regardless of whether they know what it is or not. Each metal object on a site however reached it somehow, and is a potential source of information on what happened on the site. A scatter of shapeless lead fragments is the result of some activity. Plotting them, collecting and analysing them may reveal a pattern  about past activity, but most artefact hunters simply throw them away and sell for melting down as scrap (or even themselves melt them into fishing weights for sale). Other items might be in the scrap bucket because the artefact hunter simply did not know what it was, and was unconcerned to think harder about it or research it.

There are keys in private artefact
collections, and how many lock
components? If you don't know
 what you are looking at, you
 cannot recognise it. 
The PAS database contains (14th April 2020) only 1369 unidentified objects among  1,492,100 recorded items. Yet on many larger excavations, some 60-80% of the excavated metalwork assemblage will be nondescript material of uncertain function. Other fragments require specialist knowledge to understand and identify. Quite obviously the latter type of material is not being picked up by collectors and there is the possibility that unidentified artefacts are ending up not only unrecorded, but also simply discarded or melted down for scrap.

This is of course totally irresponsible behaviour and simply damages sites and then compounds it by destroying evidence. An artefact hunter exploiting any site should be prepared to take on the responsibility to collect and archive material with all the contextual data, the significance of which is not always apparent at first, for later study. Care should always be taken not to discard archaeological evidence because it was unrecognised as such.


Tamara Kroftova comments:
"Once again, the ignorance and lack of education orf artefact hunters is leading to the removal and loss of - potentially - enormous amounts of evidence from the archaeological record. It should be the case that objects that are not recognised by the artefact hunter are retained for further study, but the majority are focused on immediate collectability and simply discard the rest. Ignorance is irresponsibility and leads to destruction."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.1: What is archaeology?

Image
Archaeological research   as a process There are many possible ways to define the subject and object of study. This is the definition of archaeology used here: Archaeology is the study of aspects the human past through the documentation and analysis of physical remains and traces, their associations and contexts, by the methodology of archaeology and dissemination of the results and conclusions. 1) " The study of aspects of the human past ", The past might be very remote, from the Lower Palaeolithic, where it may intercalate with palaeontology (but archaeologists don't do dinosaurs), to almost the present day (periods when other but not all aspects of the past are amply documented by other sources), 2)  " aspects of the human past ", many areas of the human past are arguably beyond the reach of even the most creative of archaeological thought, 3) " through the documentation ", the archaeological evidence does not exist in a vacuum, curran...
Read more

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati...
Read more

4.1 What the archaeological record looks like in the Ground

Image
If the responsible artefact hunter is to  record the bits of the archaeological record destroyed in removing artefacts in collection-driven exploitation of a site, obviously they need to know what it is they are looking for, in other words, what the archaeological record looks like. At this point, many textbooks would show the reader a section or two showing the superimposed layers ("like a cake"). But that actually is not the way the stratification of a feature are actually encountered in the field. The suggestion that it is the section that is always paramount in the recording and interpretation of a site is a very damaging one. This is despite the prevalence of s ingle-context recording in the standard excavation methodical toolkit for over half a century. The main manner in which the stratigraphical units of a site are met is from above, from the working surface. The first point that this raises is that this should at all times be kept clean of loose soil, trample ...
Read more