4.4: 'One-Layer sites'


There is a separate class of sites that need to be discussed here as they involve a whole series of other problems and investigation methods. Here the main evidence takes the form of the three-dimensional patterning of just the artefacts (and ecofacts) 'suspended' in a relatively homogeneous matrix that comprises deposits of geological/ pedological origin and may be a reflection of long-term environmental change. They are sometimes (falsely) called 'one-layer sites'. These mainly concern the archaeology of open-air sites of the Stone Age (cave sites were generally the result of other processes), but can also occur in the archaeology of other earlier prehistoric periods also. 

Here what has happened is that material that was originally lying on a ground surface has sunk into the material under them through natural pedological processes (such as worm-sorting [Link] *** or frost-heaving and other mechanisms). This may be accompanied by accumulation processes, such as aeolian processes (wind deposition). The layers that contain the artefacts are a complex mixture of a matrix that predates the human activity that has been affected by a complex series of processes post-dating the activity(ies).  Their interpretation involves interdisciplinary knowledge mainly related to the natural sciences (geology, pedology, geomorphology and others).

In the excavation of such sites the cross-section of the deposits plays an important role and one of the means by which they are investigated in small trenches excavated in a grid-pattern, allowing ongoing observation of these sections. The surface of the grid square is generally reduced in shallow mechanical spits a few centimetres in thickness and generally level. Finds are individually plotted within each grid and within each spit in three dimensions. The spoil from each trench is usually sieved, as lithic flakes and spalls may be missed, no matter how carefully the holes are excavated. Sometimes there are encountered 'hard' archaeological features, the burnt stone surrounds of a hearth for example and rarely dug features (though in sites from the distant past, their fills are often heavily leached and difficult to spot).

This method is especially frequently used in the US to study open Native American sites, and there are a number of North American excavation manuals (and online resources) that describe it. Sometimes it is presented to the exclusion of other excavation methods and approaches. Some archaeologists have attempted to apply this methodology to other types of sites, though the effects there are often very unsatisfactory. The method has an advantage that it is relatively simple and mechanical. 

Excavation of Late Upper Palaeolithic
flint scatter, Old Windsor (Wessex Archaeology)

Excavation of Late Upper Palaeolithic 
site at Guildford Fire Station (Oxford Archaeology)



Excavation of Late Palaeolithic site at
 the Renaudin Islet, Angoulême SW France
Sometimes such sites may also contain some 'hard' archaeological features such as pavements of stones or hearth remains embedded in the same kind of relatively homogeneous matrix. The determination of the method of formation of such sites needs individual analysis. Certainly such complex entities cannot be called 'one-layer sites'.

Excavation of late Palaeolithic site at Khotylevo 2, Briansk, Russia 
The material plotted out in such excavations can show various activity areas, such as this Late Upper Palaeolithic feature (postulated to have been a 'shrine') represented by concentration of material:
Upper Palaeolithic feature, Banghor in Sidhi, Madhya Pradesh (after Chakrabarti). 

Planigraphy of Upper Palaeolithic site with mammoth remains, Pushkari I, Chernigov oblast, Ukraine (Fig 23) 

Planigraphy of Upper Palaeolithic site with mammoth remains,
 Pushkari I, Chernigov oblast, Ukraine (Fig 20) 


Tamara Kroftova comments:
"Even though these sites may be seen as 'simpler' than multilayer stratified ones, it is clear that to interpret the pattern of artefacts across and within them, one needs to open up a larger area. A small artefact hunter's hole quite simply does not allow any possibility of observing the evidence of pattern, let alone making a meaningful three-dimensional record of it".
Though loose artefacts may be retrieved,
the typical dimensions of an artefact hunter's
hole will prevent observation and recording
of any information (adapted from
a Guildford Fire Station site photo)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.1: What is archaeology?

Image
Archaeological research   as a process There are many possible ways to define the subject and object of study. This is the definition of archaeology used here: Archaeology is the study of aspects the human past through the documentation and analysis of physical remains and traces, their associations and contexts, by the methodology of archaeology and dissemination of the results and conclusions. 1) " The study of aspects of the human past ", The past might be very remote, from the Lower Palaeolithic, where it may intercalate with palaeontology (but archaeologists don't do dinosaurs), to almost the present day (periods when other but not all aspects of the past are amply documented by other sources), 2)  " aspects of the human past ", many areas of the human past are arguably beyond the reach of even the most creative of archaeological thought, 3) " through the documentation ", the archaeological evidence does not exist in a vacuum, curran...
Read more

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati...
Read more

4.1 What the archaeological record looks like in the Ground

Image
If the responsible artefact hunter is to  record the bits of the archaeological record destroyed in removing artefacts in collection-driven exploitation of a site, obviously they need to know what it is they are looking for, in other words, what the archaeological record looks like. At this point, many textbooks would show the reader a section or two showing the superimposed layers ("like a cake"). But that actually is not the way the stratification of a feature are actually encountered in the field. The suggestion that it is the section that is always paramount in the recording and interpretation of a site is a very damaging one. This is despite the prevalence of s ingle-context recording in the standard excavation methodical toolkit for over half a century. The main manner in which the stratigraphical units of a site are met is from above, from the working surface. The first point that this raises is that this should at all times be kept clean of loose soil, trample ...
Read more