2.4: 'Collecting Old Things' is not Archaeology


One sometimes meets the opinion  (including from some unreflexive UK archaeologists) that collection-driven exploitation of the archaeological record and archaeology have in some way 'common aims'. This basically means that the people espousing this view consider that the aim of both is nothing more than 'collecting and contemplating (interesting) old things'. Archaeology is (should be) more than mere antiquitism. The objects do not form the object of study in themselves, that is a separate field of study altogether - material culture studies.

Artefact collections are also not a good way to curate archaeological material. For the scientific community, then, a non-profit, self-perpetuating museum is considered the safest depository for archaeological collections. With the passage of time, important artefacts in personal collections may lose their importance. When they are traded and sold without supporting documentation, they become nothing more than curios or relics, because important information about them (such as the part of the archaeological record from which each object came), is often lost. When this happens to an artefact, it loses most of its ability to be archaeological evidence. Private archaeological collections are also at risk from various factors such as fire, theft, disposal by a disgruntled or uninformed spouse, or by the collector's heirs who are unaware of the scientific importance of the specimens.

An analogy might be between stamp collecting - a loose collection of coloured pieces of paper nicely arranged on a page may be 'informative', may give various types of pleasure (aesthetic, trophy/bragging rights), but is a far different thing than the study of postal history through those stamps (in context on a cover and associated with other phenomena such as postmarks, senders address etc)

ebay
Likewise rows and rows of captured and killed butterflies labelled with place and date of capture may provide information of a kind (wing pattern/colour variation, shrinking habitats and range), but it is not ecology.

Collecting vintage costume Barbie dolls, or 'vintage' horse brasses, are not ethnology.



Tamara Kroftova comments:
"The idea that one can find reflected in much insular archaeological discussion of artefact hunting that making collections of archaeological items is some form of "citizen archaeology" is simply a naive and unreflexive denial of what the discipline archaeology is all about that has its roots in colonial exploitation of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries".

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati
Read more

9.4: Curation - Access to Information

Image
Many collectors object to archaeologists and conservation professionals criticising the notion of a "private collection", saying that the material in their own personal portable antiquities collection is available to bona fide researchers for study. While this is laudable, it should not be imagined that this is an ideal situation for any researcher. Even if an object has been recorded in a public database like the PAS, t here is no mechanism to follow the movement of objects between various ephemeral private collections after it leaves the collection of the finder. If they are not accompanied by their own documentation, even objects that had been shown to archaeologists and recorded a decade or more earlier are in effect later  totally lost to science. Even if a few decades from now a coin or brooch surfaces anonymously, it will be difficult to relate it to one of the mass of records of similar-looking objects in archived archaeological records.  Many artefacts in private
Read more

9.1: Curating Archaeological Information as a Personal Collection

Image
Antiquities collection Since the archaeological record is finite and fragile, responsible artefact hunters who are removing material and information from it must replace any information destroyed by a permanent and as full as possible documentation. The objects in a responsibly-created private collection should not be held loose, but in a form that allows them easily to be linked back to the documentation of the archaeological interference that produced them. As Ian Longworth (1992, 5) puts it, if the collected objects are to be used to fulfil their potential, then their care becomes a matter of paramount importance. It should be noted that preservation, far from being a passive role, is a task that must be worked at that calls for the use of many resources to turn good intention into reality. To be effective in this task private collections must seek to reach attainable standards and these need to apply to all aspects of the problem - the environmental conditions under whic
Read more