5.2: Archaeological Excavation Reading List


There are a number of resources that help to understand how responsibly to interact with stratified sites, apart from taking part in a fieldwork course (maybe as part of adult education), and online courses, there are also a large number of available books.

One of the amazing things about British archaeology (compared to much of the rest of the world) is the enormous number of 'how-to' (or 'why-we') books on various aspects of the discipline, far in excess of what is available anywhere else. These explain the methodology of archaeology in considerable detail. Probably there are several dozen books on archaeological fieldwork and excavation that are worth reading (and some which are not), the list below is by no means exhaustive. The Time Team webpage used to have an online reading list which included references to books about archaeological methodology, but this has disappeaered. The PAS has never produced such a list.  

 Tony Robinson and Mick Aston's 2002 book "Archaeology is Rubbish: A Beginners Guide" (Channel 4 Books) however is well worth a read, and not just for beginners.

For a more advanced understanding, I'd say the non-specialist reader need go not much further than Renfrew and Bahn's (2000) 'Archaeology: theory, methods and practice' (Thames and Hudson). 

 Martin Carver is always worth reading, so his (2009) "Archaeological Investigation" (Routledge ISBN-13: 978-0415489195) is a thought-provoking journey through various types of archaeological project. I'll include Peter Drewett's, (1999), 'Field Archaeology: an introduction', (UCL Press) out of sympathy to one of my old lecturers, but it's mostly about excavation and surface survey figures [in the book] mainly as a way of "finding sites". Back in the old days, Kevin Greene's 'Archaeology: An Introduction ' was an old favourite of mine, and it had an online resource in the form of a linked website. I admit I do not know what the newer editions are like though. John Schofield, John Carmen and Paul Belford's 2011 'Archaeological Practice in Great Britain: A Heritage Handbook' (Springer ISBN-13: 978-0387094526) might be useful for context, but is overpriced.

I'd suggest the British reader exercising a bit of caution reading US textbooks (and vice versa), there is a different approach to several aspects of fieldwork which do not always sit well with the English literature.    

Tamara Kroftova comments:
"There is no excuse for the exhibition of ignorance that we see on the previous page given the large selection of books that are readily available in Britain to 'teach yourself archaeology'. There are few - if any - countries that offer its citizens such an opportunity. The question is why so few people, wanting to 'do artefact hunting responsibly' seem to have read any of them. So often one sees some metal detectorist holding forth on 'what archaeologists do/don't do' on the basis of having merely seen some episodes of the 1990s archaeology reality show 'Time Team'. In the same way as in the collecting of portable antiquities the advice is to 'first buy the book' before attempting to acquire antiquities, the responsible artefact hunter must first have not only bought the book(s), but read them and asked questions from somebody qualified to answer them of what they don't understand, BEFORE they even take their first steps onto any search area. Can't read? Don't dig". 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.1: What is archaeology?

Image
Archaeological research   as a process There are many possible ways to define the subject and object of study. This is the definition of archaeology used here: Archaeology is the study of aspects the human past through the documentation and analysis of physical remains and traces, their associations and contexts, by the methodology of archaeology and dissemination of the results and conclusions. 1) " The study of aspects of the human past ", The past might be very remote, from the Lower Palaeolithic, where it may intercalate with palaeontology (but archaeologists don't do dinosaurs), to almost the present day (periods when other but not all aspects of the past are amply documented by other sources), 2)  " aspects of the human past ", many areas of the human past are arguably beyond the reach of even the most creative of archaeological thought, 3) " through the documentation ", the archaeological evidence does not exist in a vacuum, curran...
Read more

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati...
Read more

4.1 What the archaeological record looks like in the Ground

Image
If the responsible artefact hunter is to  record the bits of the archaeological record destroyed in removing artefacts in collection-driven exploitation of a site, obviously they need to know what it is they are looking for, in other words, what the archaeological record looks like. At this point, many textbooks would show the reader a section or two showing the superimposed layers ("like a cake"). But that actually is not the way the stratification of a feature are actually encountered in the field. The suggestion that it is the section that is always paramount in the recording and interpretation of a site is a very damaging one. This is despite the prevalence of s ingle-context recording in the standard excavation methodical toolkit for over half a century. The main manner in which the stratigraphical units of a site are met is from above, from the working surface. The first point that this raises is that this should at all times be kept clean of loose soil, trample ...
Read more