1.2: What is "Responsibility"?


"Responsible Artefact Hunting". The underlying message in the current partnership in the UK between heritage professionals and artefact hunters is that when it is done responsibly, the latter can provide useful information for archaeologists while avoiding damage to the archaeological record.

 This however raises the question of what "responsible artefact hunting" actually is.

What does 'responsible' mean in general? Dictionaries give definitions of responsibility  that read something like: 'a form of trustworthiness; the trait of being answerable to someone for something or being responsible for one's conduct' and the antonym irresponsibility (irresponsibleness): 'a form of untrustworthiness; the trait of lacking a sense of responsibility and not feeling accountable for your actions'.

It might be worth considering how the term operates in some of the common collocations: 'responsible dog ownership', 'responsible drivers', 'responsible parking', 'responsible tenants/ landlords', 'responsible parents', 'responsible drinking', 'responsible tourism', 'responsible journalism', 'responsible buyers', 'responsible host', 'environmentally responsible company/ products', 'responsible data protection', 'responsible netizens', 'responsible employers / employees' and so on. What is clear is that the term does not mean 'merely complying with the law' but involves other areas of 'being responsible', such as taking into account the rights, needs and interests of others, or being aware of the consequences of ones actions on others.

In the case of artefact hunting in Britain, there is a Code of Best Practice for Responsible [Artefact Hunting] in Britain and Wales, created in 2003 with the input of most of the major archaeological bodies and metal detecting associations and updated in 2017. It makes the point that 'if undertaken responsibly', artefact hunting by members of the public 'can make an important contribution to archaeological knowledge' and gives 'general voluntary guidance on accepted best practice'.

The text is arranged in four domains within which 'responsible artefact hunting' may be defined:
- before engaging in artefact hunting,
- while engaged in artefact hunting,
- reporting information obtained after artefact hunting and correctly curating material and information obtained,
- finding out more about archaeology and its aims and methods and artefact hunting.
These provisions define responsible behaviour in terms of following the law, taking care not to damage the landowner's property or the environment, being insured, preventing damage to the archaeological record and keeping everybody concerned informed about observations made and material obtained during each episode of artefact hunting. This code is further discussed below.


Tamara Kroftova comments:
"It seems that some people in Britain consider that "being responsible" is the equivalent of "not breaking the law". That's just silly. Being a responsible father and husband is much more than not breaking any laws on domestic violence. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati
Read more

9.4: Curation - Access to Information

Image
Many collectors object to archaeologists and conservation professionals criticising the notion of a "private collection", saying that the material in their own personal portable antiquities collection is available to bona fide researchers for study. While this is laudable, it should not be imagined that this is an ideal situation for any researcher. Even if an object has been recorded in a public database like the PAS, t here is no mechanism to follow the movement of objects between various ephemeral private collections after it leaves the collection of the finder. If they are not accompanied by their own documentation, even objects that had been shown to archaeologists and recorded a decade or more earlier are in effect later  totally lost to science. Even if a few decades from now a coin or brooch surfaces anonymously, it will be difficult to relate it to one of the mass of records of similar-looking objects in archived archaeological records.  Many artefacts in private
Read more

9.1: Curating Archaeological Information as a Personal Collection

Image
Antiquities collection Since the archaeological record is finite and fragile, responsible artefact hunters who are removing material and information from it must replace any information destroyed by a permanent and as full as possible documentation. The objects in a responsibly-created private collection should not be held loose, but in a form that allows them easily to be linked back to the documentation of the archaeological interference that produced them. As Ian Longworth (1992, 5) puts it, if the collected objects are to be used to fulfil their potential, then their care becomes a matter of paramount importance. It should be noted that preservation, far from being a passive role, is a task that must be worked at that calls for the use of many resources to turn good intention into reality. To be effective in this task private collections must seek to reach attainable standards and these need to apply to all aspects of the problem - the environmental conditions under whic
Read more