1.0 Introduction


What price a piece of the past in your hand? (Photo: eBay)
For some time now in Britain archaeologists, artefact collectors and the media have been talking of "responsible artefact hunting" (often in the form of "responsible metal detecting"). The resource, arranged in the form of a blog, is about this concept. What is responsible artefact hunting? It is argued here that this should be seen above all from the point of view of avoiding damage to the archaeological record.

The Code of Best Practice for Responsible Metal Detecting in England and Wales sets out some of the basic principles, and in its fourth section it says that "being responsible means ...finding out about archaeology". Obviously the artefact hunter cannot take responsible decisions by perceiving the potential archaeological effects of their activities without that understanding. The 'Code' itself however, cannot help gain that understanding. It is formulated merely as do/don't principles, without explaining why.  There is nothing available on this from the Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS), Council for British Archaeology (CBA) or any other archaeological body in the UK. 

This resource is therefore intended for members of the public and artefact hunters in particular to run through some of the basic issues involved with the archaeological record and the effects of artefact hunting on it and how they can be avoided. Britain is well-served by books on archaeological methodology, theory and practice, perhaps more than any other country in the world. The mass of material available, however, also renders a systematic survey of even a portion of the literature on the issue a daunting process. Another factor is the lack of consensus or a clear outline of the issues involved which may induce more confusion than enlightenment in the unguided explorer of these issues. The view presented here is my own, based on the literature cited, and is provided here as a basis for discussion.

This series of texts therefore aims to lay down a few paths to understanding the issues surrounding the responsible use of the archaeological record by artefact hunters, whether or not they are using a metal detector. While it represents a mainstream view, it does not claim to be either authoriative or exhaustive.

Tamara Kroftova comments:
"It seems that there is a lack of consensus about what "best practice" is when it concerns artefact hunting and collecting. While in Britain, there has for some time been a Code of Best Practice for Responsible Metal Detecting in England and Wales (last updated in 2017), it does not seem to have attracted the attention of many people -landowners and artefact hunters included, besides which does not cover the entire range of issues that one might have expected it to address, such as the issue of curating an artefact collection and its attendant documentation".





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2.1: What is archaeology?

Image
Archaeological research   as a process There are many possible ways to define the subject and object of study. This is the definition of archaeology used here: Archaeology is the study of aspects the human past through the documentation and analysis of physical remains and traces, their associations and contexts, by the methodology of archaeology and dissemination of the results and conclusions. 1) " The study of aspects of the human past ", The past might be very remote, from the Lower Palaeolithic, where it may intercalate with palaeontology (but archaeologists don't do dinosaurs), to almost the present day (periods when other but not all aspects of the past are amply documented by other sources), 2)  " aspects of the human past ", many areas of the human past are arguably beyond the reach of even the most creative of archaeological thought, 3) " through the documentation ", the archaeological evidence does not exist in a vacuum, curran...
Read more

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati...
Read more

6.9: A Surface Survey Reading List

Image
It may be helpful to provide a reading list to explore the aspects of surface survey not covered in this brief guide. These books and articles are at  different levels, from popular to more specialist, some old classics, some newer. Aston, M. and Rowley, T. 1974, ' Landscape Archaeology: An Introduction to Fieldwork Techniques on Post-Roman Landscapes ', David & Charles ISBN-13: 978-0715366707) O/P Aston M. 1985. Interpreting the Landscape: Landscape Archaeology and Local History . London and New York: Routledge. Banning, E.B. 2002, ' Archaeological Survey ', (Kluwer Academic / Plenum - ). Brown A.E. 1988, ' Fieldwork for Archaeologists and Local Historians '  (Batsford, ISBN 13: 978071344842) O/P Collins, J.M., Molyneaux B.L. 2003, ' Archaeological Survey (Archaeologist's Toolkit)  ' (AltaMira Press ISBN-13: 978-0759100213) English Heritage 2007 ' Understanding the archaeology of landscapes: a guide to good r...
Read more