3.1: The Archaeological Record


The archaeological record is a core concept of archaeology in the English-speaking world, yet one that is difficult to define adequately. Archaeology is in effect the academic discipline concerned with documenting and interpreting the archaeological record.  Inasmuch as the historical record is the body of written and other documentary material that forms the evidence for the creation of the historiographic interpretation of the past, the archaeological record is the body of physical evidence usable to create the archaeological interpretation of the past. Archaeological method and theory supply the normative means to allow interpretations to be made and assessed.

The notion of 'archaeological record' is a cover-all concept for a set of material or physical traces that can be used as a basis for archaeological inference. As such, depending on the subject being investigated, it could range in size from, for example, a single hunter-gatherer's hearth and discrete associated tool scatter in an otherwise barren blowout in a sand dune, to entire landscapes [***] or spreads of material created by specific processes (a layer of alluvium in a river valley caused by Neolithic soil erosion). It can consist of evidence relating to the earliest human societies as well as contemporary ones.

Components of the archaeological record include built structures, landscape features, spatial data, soil deposits and the interfaces between them, excavated features (pits, ditches, postholes etc), artefacts (lost, deposited, abandoned, discarded), the traces of mortuary practices, evidence of human impact on the environment, animal remains and plant remains. While the archaeological record contains artefacts, and the artefacts themselves are a 'record' of some activity/phenomenon, in terms of both volume and, often, import, the bulk of the archaeological record consists of soil or similar deposit (matrix).

Meillionydd, Gwynedd view of the fragile
 archaeological record (Karl and Waddington)

 Cromerian deposits 800-500 ka [MIS 19 to MIS 13] exposed on the foreshore
at Happisburgh, Norfolk (handaxe find site)

Various layers generated by geological
and anthropogenic processes (Springer)

late Middle/ early Upper Pleistocene elephant butchery
site at Karonga in the Malawi Rift valley
(broken and dispersed elephant bones, 314 artefacts).
Rectangular enclosure ditch under excavation, Barton Quarry, Burton-on-Trent
Mudbrick walls revealed by different soil
consistencies after surface cleaning, tell in Iraq

In the context of artefact hunting, it should be added that the archaeological record often contains items that by their character were made to carry and convey information (so-called 'addressed sources'). These include emblemic items (worn or carried to show affiliation with a certain social or interest group) and items bearing writing. The latter include coins and other written material, such as cuneiform tablets, papyrus fragments, lead curses etc. They form only part of the archaeological record (which will include their mutual relationships, their context, such as for example as parts of a document or archive, parts of discrete batches of tablets in for example their place of storage within one or more archives in a specific location in a complex, pattern of deposition of lead curses). Loose tablets, papyri fragments or pieces of inscribed metal are not any kind of archaeological record. The same goes for coins.

Tamara Kroftova comments:
"Since it seems such a key notion, it is odd that there is so little discussion of the concept in insular discussion in artefact hunting circles. On metal detecting forums, and among collectors generally, it seems that members think that merely knowing a findspot already is an adequate replacement of the information lost when a find is ripped out of the archaeological record. It is very odd that British archaeologists have done so little to disabuse them of this notion".

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati
Read more

9.4: Curation - Access to Information

Image
Many collectors object to archaeologists and conservation professionals criticising the notion of a "private collection", saying that the material in their own personal portable antiquities collection is available to bona fide researchers for study. While this is laudable, it should not be imagined that this is an ideal situation for any researcher. Even if an object has been recorded in a public database like the PAS, t here is no mechanism to follow the movement of objects between various ephemeral private collections after it leaves the collection of the finder. If they are not accompanied by their own documentation, even objects that had been shown to archaeologists and recorded a decade or more earlier are in effect later  totally lost to science. Even if a few decades from now a coin or brooch surfaces anonymously, it will be difficult to relate it to one of the mass of records of similar-looking objects in archived archaeological records.  Many artefacts in private
Read more

9.1: Curating Archaeological Information as a Personal Collection

Image
Antiquities collection Since the archaeological record is finite and fragile, responsible artefact hunters who are removing material and information from it must replace any information destroyed by a permanent and as full as possible documentation. The objects in a responsibly-created private collection should not be held loose, but in a form that allows them easily to be linked back to the documentation of the archaeological interference that produced them. As Ian Longworth (1992, 5) puts it, if the collected objects are to be used to fulfil their potential, then their care becomes a matter of paramount importance. It should be noted that preservation, far from being a passive role, is a task that must be worked at that calls for the use of many resources to turn good intention into reality. To be effective in this task private collections must seek to reach attainable standards and these need to apply to all aspects of the problem - the environmental conditions under whic
Read more