10.3: Commercial Metal Detecting Rallies


Irresponsible commercialisation of the archaeological record (Detectival)

 Commercial artefact hunting rallies are events where a landowner sells temporary access to a piece of land containing archaeological and historical artefacts to metal detectorists who after paying the organizers a fixed fee convene there sometimes in very large numbers and take away everything they find and want to keep, unless it comes under the treasure legislation. In an attempt to make this look like a legitimate use of the archaeological record, the organisers can make a donation to a charity from the proceeds.

Most archaeologists think that, in addition to commercialising archaeological objects, metal-detecting rallies ( can be damaging to archaeology. Often random, searching takes place over a large area of land, and it is almost impossible for anyone to make a proper record of all objects found.

In the past, it was recommended that "if a metal-detecting rally occurs, to reduce damage and ensure better preservation of the archaeological record [...] organisers should follow the Guidance on Metal-Detecting Rallies in England and Wales (see www.finds.org.uk/rallycode). That document is no longer online and in the name of promoting best practice the PAS now has the following text on its website: 
The PAS does not provide advice for metal-detecting rally organisers
Large scale metal-detecting events (rallies) do not provide the ideal circumstances for Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) staff to record finds in the field, and can therefore result in the loss of much archaeological information, including information about the findspot.
So they should not be taking place and responsible artefact hunters should simply stay away from the scene of such activity - unless in order to prevent them happening.

Large scale commercial looting in progress



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3.3: Archaeological layers

Image
In talking about archaeological context we tend to think of it in terms of being composed of individual layers. These are discrete units of sediment, debris, rock, and other materials that form or accumulate as the result of natural processes, human activity, or both. In order to describe them and indicate their position on a site and in its sequence, these layers are generally numbered sequentially (with the lowest number being that removed first). An individual layer or deposit may be termed (following geological nomenclature) a stratum, and multiple layers are called strata. Therefore the study of their sequence is called stratigraphy (description of what we call the stratification). One of the simplest ways to depict layers is to depict them as a vertical sequence and this is frequently done in the form of a section (or 'profile') through them. Here is an explanation from Michigan State University 'Campus Archaeology' page "Archaeology 101: Reading strati
Read more

9.4: Curation - Access to Information

Image
Many collectors object to archaeologists and conservation professionals criticising the notion of a "private collection", saying that the material in their own personal portable antiquities collection is available to bona fide researchers for study. While this is laudable, it should not be imagined that this is an ideal situation for any researcher. Even if an object has been recorded in a public database like the PAS, t here is no mechanism to follow the movement of objects between various ephemeral private collections after it leaves the collection of the finder. If they are not accompanied by their own documentation, even objects that had been shown to archaeologists and recorded a decade or more earlier are in effect later  totally lost to science. Even if a few decades from now a coin or brooch surfaces anonymously, it will be difficult to relate it to one of the mass of records of similar-looking objects in archived archaeological records.  Many artefacts in private
Read more

9.1: Curating Archaeological Information as a Personal Collection

Image
Antiquities collection Since the archaeological record is finite and fragile, responsible artefact hunters who are removing material and information from it must replace any information destroyed by a permanent and as full as possible documentation. The objects in a responsibly-created private collection should not be held loose, but in a form that allows them easily to be linked back to the documentation of the archaeological interference that produced them. As Ian Longworth (1992, 5) puts it, if the collected objects are to be used to fulfil their potential, then their care becomes a matter of paramount importance. It should be noted that preservation, far from being a passive role, is a task that must be worked at that calls for the use of many resources to turn good intention into reality. To be effective in this task private collections must seek to reach attainable standards and these need to apply to all aspects of the problem - the environmental conditions under whic
Read more